You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
21

[–] draaaak 1 point 21 points (+22|-1) ago 

Yup, 100% the owner's fault. She was not able to maintain control of her dogs, largely because they are stronger than her. She also wasn't paying attention to her surroundings, and should not have given them so much leash. Those dogs were walking her.

2
21

[–] 9-11 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

It's objectively a dangerous breed. Owning one should be legal, but no different than owning a gun. The owner should be charged as if they had walked up and killed the cat.

0
6

[–] draaaak 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It's objectively a dangerous breed.

All dogs are predators, they all have the potential to be dangerous. It's up to the owner to make sure the dog doesn't hurt anyone or anything it's not supposed to. I train dogs professionally and work with loads of aggressive dogs; I guarantee you that every single time a dog bites someone, or kills a cat, or kills a kid, it is the fault of the owner/handler. Unless we're dealing with a clear cut defense situation, then it's almost always the fault of the person getting bit.

Owning one should be legal, but no different than owning a gun.

Shall not be infringed.

The owner should be charged as if they had walked up and killed the cat.

100%

0
0

[–] 15280465? ago 

That's entirely way too reasonable...