0
1

[–] not_drunk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Info is already in public view.

Merely consolidated the data for them.

Cooperating was the right thing to do.

0
0

[–] Caesarkid1 [S] ago 

They don't have DM's on gab?

0
0

[–] not_drunk ago 

What's a DM?
I have only 10 minutes of surfing gab.

1
1

[–] Mr_Sir 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

How is gab colluding?

0
1

[–] Caesarkid1 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Gab has spent the past 48 hours proudly working with the DOJ and FBI to bring justice to an alleged terrorist. Because of the data we provided, they now have plenty of evidence for their case.

0
2

[–] Mr_Sir 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Once again, how is that collusion? It's called cooperation. What did you expect them to do, refuse to share already publicly disclosed information on the guy? I'm not saying it's good or bad, but proper vocabulary is important and you fail to recognize that.

0
0

[–] carlip ago 

The cops can just get a warrant any ways

0
0

[–] FreeinTX ago 

There is nothing wrong with, and you are lawfully required to, cooperate with a law enforcement investigation.

0
0

[–] Caesarkid1 [S] ago 

It could be set up in such a way that private messages on the service are not decryptable by gab. Like how protonmail handles emails.

In that case it would be impossible to comply with anything that was not openly public.