0
12

[–] Aprioned 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Still doesn't justify their ban.

0
3

[–] EdSnowden [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Exactly the opposite I’d say. Clearly you could be more effective with semi-auto

0
7

[–] TimberWolfAlpha 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The ban is intolerable on matters of principle, not out of any practicality. a RIGHT does not need to be efficient, nor does it need to be justified. It doesn't matter if bump stocks are worthless or not, it's still a foot in a door that needs to be closed.

0
2

[–] gentronseven 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It will be used as justification to ban all semi-autos based on antis logic.

"Semi auto is more effective than a bump stock! all fully semi automatic guns should be banned"

0
7

[–] Trousersnake1488 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Makes Las Vegas sound even dumber

0
5

[–] badruns 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Automatic weapons were used in Vegas. The bumpstock ban is a farce. I'm pretty a lot of you know this already, but it seems like some of you don't.

0
4

[–] kazikasona 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I think the ATF might tell Jerry he HAS to use a bump stock because it makes him shoot slower

0
3

[–] Buff_Awesome 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Bump stocks were invented so that the handicapped could do the technique. Any able-bodied person can bump a rifle.

0
1

[–] HeavyBeefCurtain 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

give jerry a railgun and he'll fight ISIS from his backyard!

1
-1

[–] MBB 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Jerry and Chuck Norris. Two man Marine Corp

0
1

[–] MikeyMo123 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Even if they did, who gives a shit?

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)