Citizens are more powerful then you think. Militias are protected in our second amendment. Liberals are REEEing over this, but I am proud of these rednecks. Yeah, throughout the course of my day at work, I've been reading the coverage of this on Daily Beast, Slate, Think Progress, Common Dreams, NPR and The Guardian. The leftwing media is super ass-hurt about these guys. They're all left wing and want a super authoritarian state. The fact that citizens have the freedom to take any sort of initiative in their life terrifies the left winger.

http://archive.is/lAUkk

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna996516

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham on Friday lashed out at members of a militia group who are stopping migrants at the border, declaring "regular citizens have no authority to arrest or detain anyone."

Fucking REEEEEEEEEEEEE

I love that the Left calls people like them LARPers when they buy guns and show them off, then freak out when they are actually active and doing something. It must blow their mind people do something other than post online about wanting to be active in the community or going to a yearly protest. If the state fails to act, men will. Time goes on and the frustration grows. Distractions become less satisfying. Eventually people form militias and squads.

The point is: they're fucking illegals. Just shoot them and put them in a mass grave in the desert. Nobody is looking for them and you can just blame the cartels. Honestly the first time a large massacre happens on the border then the government will actually start patrolling the area. Sounds like a win-win to me.

It would be awesome to make crossing the border illegally a felony. Then we could fingerprint them and forbid them from voting or holding public office. Ending birthright citizenship would also be awesome. And closing the fucking "asylum" loophole, that'd be awesome as all shit.

I mean think about it: the way that it's being abused is just egregious. When people get caught passing a bad check or dining and dashing, we don't let them yell out "Chapter 11" and suspend all criminal and civil penalties against them because it's legal to discharge your debts to creditors by filing bankruptcy. We don't pretend the process of filing bankruptcy retroactively and instantly covers the crimes they committed. But let an illegal say "asylum", and that's the magic word. Suddenly their self-evident crime of illegal migration has to be processed and evaluated as though they ever had a valid asylum claim in the first place. It's bullshit. We're giving illegals more civil rights than our citizens have and immunity to our laws.

Reminder: unfortunately there's about 60 years of laws at work here to prevent us from just shipping them back. Fucking 1965 immigration act. This really opened the flood gates and it was only after that did America see the major demographic changes we have to deal with today. We need the old immigration act that only took in limited amounts of Europeans.

Far too often,I see people say "we go along with this bad idea because it's easier than fighting about it". Some examples would be:

"We're banning words like "nigger" and "kike" because they're needlessly offensive and have no place in an adult conversation."

"We're banning talk about how someone blatantly lied to everyone to spare their feelings."

And "There are women and child here so we're banning bad words. This is a family friendly place."

This is what capitulation looks like. They are not compromising. Compromise means you're getting something in return. While the owners of the forum might get some kind of kick back,the users are punished and get nothing for it. They will ban our favorite insults,but not the SJW's. They will never ban words like nazi,bigot,or patriarchy. Because they don't give a damn about our feelings or rights.

Capitulation is demanding your soldiers go into a modern battlefield unarmed and then berating them when they still win. They are not "compromising",they're giving up. And then they wonder why they suddenly lose business. You can't attack your customers and expect them to still want your product. You can't break off chunks of functions and features and expect people to still want this inferior product.

This is erosion of your rights. This is taking away your agency. And they're ok with it. Fuck anyone who takes away rights and says "it's in the name of compromise".

I don't see why this isn't a reasonable question for a chem exam.

A chemistry professor whose exam question asked students to calculate the lethal dose of a poisonous gas used in Nazi gas chambers during the Holocaust has taken a leave of absence. Middlebury College in Vermont said that it's investigating under the terms of its faculty misconduct policy.

'This inexplicable failure of judgment trivializes one of the most horrific events in world history, violates core institutional values, and simply has no place on our campus,' wrote Middlebury President Laurie Patton last week. 'We expect our faculty to teach and lead with thoughtfulness, good judgment, and maturity. To say we have fallen short in this instance is an understatement.'

The question posed by Byers asked students to calculate how much poison it would take for them to create a lethal dose of hydrogen cyanide, the deadly chemical mixture used on Jewish people in the Nazi gas chambers during the Holocaust. 'Hydrogen cyanide is a poisonous gas, which Nazi Germany used to horrific ends during The Holocaust,' Byers wrote, according to Middlebury Campus.

'The lethal dose for humans is approximately 300. mg of HCN gas per kilogram of air when inhaled... If a room measured [redacted] ft. what mass of air would it have in g if the density fo the air [redacted] [Celsius] (room temperature) is [redacted]?' The exam also instructed students to, 'Calculate the g of HCN that would give a lethal dose in the above room.'

Archived Daily Fail article

Non-archivable local Faux News article

Archived CBS Jews article

Zyklon b was more expensive to make than crating in a more pure form of hydrogen cyanide(s). And even hydrogen cyanide in pellet form is not something anyone would legitmately try and genocide a group of people with. If you want to kill a bunch of people quick and easy, displace oxygen in the tanks. No unnecessary, messy, hazardous chemicals involved.Llet's not pretend like Germans weren't the world leaders in engineering at the time.

You know, if i were a "nasty nazi" looking for efficiency solutions for my freedom labor camp, I would probably experiment with delousing entire groups of people at one go - so, I would like to know the lethal dosage of this delousing agent so that I can be sure not to exceed it. I don't want to kill off my labor but I do want to kill the lice they carry.

Honestly, the whole gas thing is so stupid and makes no sense. There are much simpler and cheaper ways to kill people. I can't believe people still believe this nonsense.

The real irony is that kikes came up with all of that crazy shit because that's the kind of thing they'd do to goyim if left to their own devices. What kind of psychopath conceptualizes a fucking rollercoaster that catapults you into an oven, or a machine that faps you to death, when asked to describe a simple prison camp? A jew, that's who. These are their fantasies.