As a compliment to other Executive Summaries on this subverse, this one is an attempt to aggregate all news, evidence and rumours with a modicum of substance which may be indicative of the British Royal Family’s participation in paedophilia, political-loyalty/blackmail club child abuse and or ritual abuse with occult trappings.
This is a COLLABORATIVE post - I invite you all to submit your independent knowledge and findings which I will edit into the main body of this thread (so apologies if comments below dont seem contiguous with the main body of the post’s text as I edit and re-edit)
I acknowledge that there are those who don’t necessarily believe that the Royals paedophile network, if there is one, is the same or integrated with the Washington D.C. one which is the epicentre of the scandal given the moniker ‘Pizzagate’. However, prominent, proven Elite UK paedo scandals bear all the same dynamics - the ex Prime Minister Ted Heath was acknowledged by police chiefs, posthumously, as a pedophile - but the allegations of his Satanic.occult practices have been denied although Jimmy Saville practically flaunted his occultism, and the Marc Dutroux affair across the pond featured child abuse, satanism and Royal connections.
To place the conclusion near the start, on a 1-10 ‘Epstein’ scale of likely culpability (10 being Convicted of child prostitution for elite clientele, and Podesta being at, say, 8 or 9 - falling short of the ‘10’ simply by virtue of not being convicted despite considerable evidence) I’d probably put the UK Royal family at about a 5 or 6 at most. Aside from Virginia Roberts (and other Epstein testifiers) ‘when-where-how’ of Prince Andrew, the rest is a swirl of very close and long held associations with established paedophiles. While we can at least condemn the Royals for an apparent indifference to the obscene proclivities of their associates, I think we have to give reasonable benefit of doubt to the fact that being such high profile people - and being in the public eye for generations - means that anyone known to the Royals who ends up being convicted of paedophilia will elicit accusations of complicity. That, and they have many enemies who would delight in arguing or ensuring that the 'unsubstantiated' appeared otherwise. Folks familiar with these investigations, the ‘red-pilled’ or even ‘black-pilled’ might place it at a 9 out of 10 - I mean, why would the Royals be exempt when the Vatican is a nest of pedos, the UN is a mobile pedo ring, Dutroux’ 1st stint in prison was truncated by a pardon by the Belgian King, & Washington DC’s atrocities against children are this subverse’s namesake. But I put that 6 out of 10 on a basis of material fact known to the public, and not the deductions of the more erudite.
Anyway, let’s delve in
For an historical hint, the 1888 reign of terror in London’s East End, where 7 prostitutes were murdered by the never identified ‘Jack the Ripper’ held Prince Albert Victor as a leading suspect. The Prince’s bloodlust was attributed to late stage syphilis, however, and even if true it cannot be construed to imply a continuum of hereditary depravity to the contemporary heirs.
In the first half of the 20th Century, Queen Elizabeth’s uncle, Lord Mountbatten, was alleged to have a perverse sex life including the abuse of young boys
There were rumors of the Queen being deeply disturbed by some undisclosed conduct of Prince Philip in a 1953 trip to New Zealand, where she compelled him to walk behind her by several paces at the airport when they returned to England. Another such scandal involving abducting native children is said to have occurred in a 60's trip to Canada, but the testimony is given to an NGO calling itself an 'International Tribunal' - but with no acknowledged power or jurisdiction
In the 1980s there was a 40 page document by an MP detailing paedopile activities of UK politicians and Buckingham Palace which came to be known as the Westminster Files or Dossier. It was passed to Britain’s top lawmen to take action, but the file ‘went missing’. When the resulting scandal prompted a revival of the matter, a constant wheel of appointment-investigation-resignation before conclusion- has persisted to this day. Theresa May has overseen the recent faffing of the matter, although the Establishment has conceded that former PM Ted Heath was a confirmed paedophile.
Documents of such nature go missing regularly in the UK, such as the report on sex abuse at the Scottish school where Prince Phillip and his son, Charles were educated
Jimmy Savile is, of course, a big red flag. The UK establishment covered up and denounced 30 years of accusations (Sex Pistol’s Johnny Rotten was banned from the BBC for life for insinuating Savile was a pedo on air in 1978). His victims are said to number between 500 and 1000, including occult rituals, murder, and necrophilia. Which is, apparently, what they look for ‘in polite circles’ as Savile was so close to the Royals that he made the arrangement for Royal parties, and Prince Charles would come to visit him at his cabin retreat. He was so close to the Royals that he acted in a counseller /attempted reconciliator role in both the Andrew/Fergie and Charles/Diana marriage breakdowns
Connected to the Savile / Prince Charles affair was also Peter Ball, a Bishop who Prince Charles worked very closely with at times. He was convicted in 2015 of historical sex crimes with minors, with Charles denying accusations that he intervened to get Ball off the hook in previous legal proceedings.
Decades of rumors also preceded the conviction of Rolfe Harris, the Australian children's entertainer who was an inner circle friend/favorite of the Royals. He was sentenced to 6 years for abuses against 4 underage victims
In the Jeffrey Epstein ‘Pedophile Island’ case, one of the women who put Epstein behind bars (such as his soft sentencing actually imposed), Virginia Roberts accused Prince Andrew of availing himself of her ‘services’ on 3 occasions in 2001 . Andrew appeared to remain on good terms with Epstein after his conviction, and prior to it Epstein was invited to Royal estates on numerous occasions. And maybe this branches too deep into the realm of speculation, but why would Epstein feel the need to give money to Fergie, or what really caused her marriage to breakdown?
In 2011 police found the remains of a homeless man’s body on an island in the Thames river in line of sight of Buckingham palace. The cadaver had rested there unnoticed for 3 years. Upon identifying the man’s remains, it turned out that it was a man wanted for penning hundreds of obscene letters to the Queen. What made that man dysfunctional, and with perverse grievances against the Royals?
Around the same time there was found a deceased (murdered) 17 yr old girl on the Queen’s Sandringham property, but it was later attributed to Baltic drug-mafia activities. I’m confident, too, that had the Royals been involved, its unlikely theyd just let her corpse rot in the woods on their property, theyd arrange a more comprehensive disposal.
In 2008 the Queen’s own butler -Paul Kidd -was convicted of running a paedophile ring during his tenure of employment, with 29 convictions for 3 boy victims. Other victims have testified that they were abused inside the walls of Buckingham palace by a ring of abusers, not just an individual.
And in 2015 there was quite the tourist video of a naked man or boy climbing out a Buckingham Palace window, as if escaping his captors.
Some people did videos alleging it to be debunked, though - but I’m not convinced. Give me your forensic opinion below.