[–] 8_billion_eaters 2 points 29 points (+31|-2) ago 

..was expecting "HIV".

[–] midnightblue1335 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The answer to this should ALWAYS be HIV.

[–] FakeNewzIsFake 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Was thinking hiv..

[–] mudbear 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Came here to say this, was going to lose a lot of faith in voat if this wasnt the top comment!

[–] dias17se 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Theres nothing positive about gays, they infiltrate politics and social life like jews, destroy the social fabric of the family, corrupt the youngs minds, and are just a stepping stone to legalize pedophilia and transgenders. They first had to normalize gays, now that its been achieved now they will move to other objectives. They are a nuclear tool by the left.

[–] Skeeterdo 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

Aaaaaand another reddit link. It's so easy to reupload... come on. It took me 15 seconds on mobile.

https://kek.gg/i/6PkrKt.jpg

[–] Reddit_traitor 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

i am more upset at the goats that upvoat that shit..

[–] Silencedmajor 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I always recall a quote from Blackadder.

Doctor Leech: It isn't every day a man wakes up to discover he's a screaming bender with no more right to live on God's clean Earth than a weasel. Ashamed of yourself?

Blackadder: Not really, no.

Doctor Leech: Bloody Hell. I would be. Still, why should I complain. Just leaves more rampant totty for us real men, eh?

Blackadder: Look, am I paying for this abuse or is it extra?

Doctor Leech: No, no, it's all part of the service.

-Based Doctor Leech.

[–] Etheral 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

I saw a better response that said, "You can't reproduce."

[–] PHXSunlight 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That's just illogical, unless they're sterile/infertile. Tons of gays have reproduced via self-forced heterosexual sex or surrogates.

[–] Etheral 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's not illogical. The comparative ability for them to reproduce is drastically insignificant. There ain't many of them like the media makes out.

[–] valk2 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah but they can adopt kids and then abuse them. Mental or physical take your pick. I don't think they should be allowed to adopt.

I can get behind your point 100 when we stop them from adopting. This is why Russia doesn't allow the US to Adopt kids, well at least during the Obama years. I am not sure if that was changed after Trump.

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I take it a step further than no adoption, they shouldn't be allowed to have a surrogate either. They claim they are born that way, well, that's just another form of sterilization/infertility in my eyes.

[–] Etheral 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Well, I am probably one of the most liberal folks on this site, while being a right-winger.

Anything but the state having the kids. I will take homos adopting if not enough heteros are adopting (heteros obviously get choice). Anything but the state.

[–] HillBoulder 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Getting two birds stoned!

[–] cuello_rojo 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I never thought of it that way. Fags are our friends. Yay fags!

[–] dias17se 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Theres nothing positive about gays, they infiltrate politics and social life like jews, destroy the social fabric of the family, corrupt the youngs minds, and are just a stepping stone to legalize pedophilia and transgenders. They first had to normalize gays, now that its been achieved now they will move to other objectives.

[–] Photogenius 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

hahahahaha

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)