The official SC info site provides a transcript of yesterdays court hearing and Ginsburg is listed there to have attended and asked questions. So it's quite sure she lives (or was replaced by a double long ago, I disregard that version here).
Most of us (me included) have been fooled by a lot of disinfo regarding Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Instead of insisting that our conclusions must have been right, I suggest to check the facts and assumptions the conclusions were based.
These are the Q drops I found about RBG:
Q2735 (repeats 2653)
The first drops are about their cancelled plan to replace her with Loretty Lynch when there was that fake president BHO.
On her health there's only
2653 with this:
Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.
2667 with an article and the question: "First time in more than 25 years?"
2735 repeating 2653 and the statement: "Be prepared for more FAKE NEWS disinfo claiming we stated ‘death’. Read carefully. F15."
But where did we get the [dis]info from? From the fake news media.
Where did the media get it? Mainly from the SC info site. 6 documents there, search for "Ginsburg", from 2009, 2014 and 2018.
And where did the SC get the info? From RBG and her team. So that's the original source!
What reasons could she have to hide her real medical diagnosis and how this is treated?
She may want to hide the diagnosis because she doesn't want to let the public know how severe it is. But even the diagnosises we have been told are severe. So it's probably the treatment she doesn't want us to know. Most likely because it is very immoral or even criminal. One theory is that the drug she gets is adrenochrome. Maybe, but this doesn't explain her continuing decay (falling into sleep in public several times) and then a sudden recovery after a cancer operation every 10 years.
Every 10 years? Wait, this could be the clue!
In 1999 she had 'colon cancer' (Washington Hospital Center)
In 2009 she had ' pancreatic cancer' (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City)
In 2015 not a cancer, but a 'a coronary catheterization' (MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute at MedStar Washington Hospital Center )
In Nov 2018 there were 'broken ribs' and then in Dec 2018 'lung cancer'. (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City)
Do you remember this? David Rockefeller has had 5 or 6 heart transplants.
Normaly a person in this age (for a lung over 65) has no chance to get a donor organ except with help of criminals. RBG is an essential asset for the DS. They'll try everything to keep her in place.
So what if she got at least a lung transplantation in 1999, 2009 and now again? As far as I know 10 years is the average time a donated lung will last. The first Operations would have have been planned before so she didn't miss any SC argument, see Q2667. But as they noticed in 2018 that she wouldn't make it until the next longer holidays, she suddenly 'broke her ribs' and surprisingly had her cancer that again disappeared completely after the op (that's not normal!).
The most common lung diseases for which people undergo lung transplant are: (www.webmd.com/lung/lung-transplant-surgery)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema and chronic bronchitis)
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension
This is just a theory. But I think it answers a lot of the above questions. Especially the sudden recoveries and why they have to hide something probably illegal.
Any opinions on that theory?