5
45

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 5 points 45 points (+50|-5) ago 

Are you serious?

The purpose of the hate list is public shaming. It has no purpose if it is,private.

The purpose of the terror watch list is to clandestinely watch potentail terrorists without letting them know. If it were public they would know how to hide their activities better.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 64 points (+64|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
26

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Well I think everyone who isnt full on PC retarded is aware how insane a wrongrhink database is.

0
3

[–] KarateCowboy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

As Westerners, we have the Judeo-Christian moral ethic. Remember the Seven Deadly Sins? Hate is not one of them. Anger, lust, envy, laziness, pride, gluttony, and greed.

Pride is at the root of all sins, hate included. Why is there no pride list? Gluttony? Anger? What about laziness?

0
3

[–] 9259949? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Incidentally you both missed a potential huge optimization of the current watchlists. If the terrorist watch list was public, it would probably work better at stopping terrorists than if it was like how it is now.

0
2

[–] Plant_Boy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think he's pretty bang on.

Having a public hate list tells/shames the public into not questioning that they should hate certain people.

Having a hidden terrorist list hides that you could be investigated so you're ignorant of being watched.

0
5

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Why isnt everyone on the terror watch list deported immediatly?

Why are more potential terrrorist always let in?

0
4

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

because then some faggot could put YOU on a watch list for no reason other than you fucked his daughter, then off to sandniggerstand you go

0
2

[–] Cheesebooger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yeah but maybe some on that list are just people who said something about blacks or jews

0
2

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because we don't know who is on it or why? Those lists are compiled by the same type of people who use the NSA to violate our civil rights. You are talking about systems which do things like refuse to let Michael Savage enter the UK. I for one do not trust them to only have terrorists or terrorist supporters on their lists.

0
2

[–] mudbear 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It would be A LOT more useful for citizens to know who potential terrorists are over who used a naughty word on voat that one time.

Liberal police state.

0
0

[–] cynicaloldfart ago 

"If you see something, say something". Ok, help me know who I should pay particular attention to.

1
20

[–] gazillions 1 point 20 points (+21|-1) ago 

What an absolutely disgusting bunch of bitches running that place. Apparently Swedes don't mind being treated like ill behaved 4 year olds. Canada is attempting the same feminist bitch move with their islamaphobia law. They need their asses kicked

0
10

[–] NoMoreScreenNames 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They've always been like that.

Back when I was in high school (early 1980s) , my parents had a Reader's Digest subscription. I remember reading in an issue a puff-piece on Sweden. The point of the puff-piece was that Sweden was the best place in the world, and part of the evidence trotted out as proof was:'

In apartments, the residential authorities found that having communal meals made for a great group dynamic : So group meals were then made mandatory.

Spaying and neutering pets was banned, to "encourage responsible pet ownership"

There were other proofs offered, but those are the two that stuck in my mind.

As an introvert, the "mandatory meals" thing made my skin crawl ; the pet thing offended me because it showed the government was treating adult pet owners as children earning an allowance (and years later I learned that this gave Sweden a rate of ovarian cancer in dogs EIGHT TIMES what is seen in countries where females not ear marked for breeding are spayed automatically).

The Reader's Digest article thought it was proving that Sweden was a paradise, but it depicted a "soft authoritarian" country in which citizens are treated as children all their lives, with no right to make their own decisions , and I considered myself a left leaning liberal then, NOT a conservative or libertarian.

THAT'S how bad that article was...And again, the writer(s) of it thought they made Sweden look great.

1
3

[–] perihelion0 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

I'm betting a Jew wrote that article. Also Jews subverted Sweden.

0
2

[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That explains a lot. They're a very foreign people.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] 9259742? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Everybody on the hate list ftw !

0
2

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well, the Muslims appear willing to do so, at least to their young attractive women.

0
7

[–] finalchao 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Give them enough time and they'll kill the men and enslave the women.

Just like they do in their own countries.

0
6

[–] 9259720? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Because when you make the terror watch list public you automatically end up on the hate registry ah !

0
4

[–] goatboy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Because Sweden's enemy has infiltrated its government and is waging a war of extermination on the Swedish people.

0
3

[–] 1202017 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Aged 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Their hate registry wasn't supposed to be public. It was discovered accidentally on twitter because some guy messed up.

0
1

[–] RiverWind 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Why doesn't this have more votes?

0
2

[–] Samchay6 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

A picture is worth a thousand words

...Sweden is cucked beyond repair.

0
1

[–] hafen 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Because if it were public, swedish gov would be on the hate list themselves.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)