Profile overview for thewebofslime.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1331 submissions to newswhatever

383 submissions to news

315 submissions to thewebofslime

278 submissions to CRIMENEWS

233 submissions to politicalnews

This user has so far shared a total of 3565 links, started a total of 142 discussions and submitted a total of 1261 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 8064 and downvoted 69 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 2145 and downvoted 75 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Brazil's New President Eliminates LGBT Office on First Day in Office, submitted: 1/12/2019 2:33:21 AM, 527 points (+529|-2)

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat, submitted: 1/17/2019 5:56:18 PM, 297 points (+305|-8)

Migrants banned from Finnish schools and daycare centers after multiple child rape cases - Voice of Europe, submitted: 2/10/2019 7:06:56 PM, 233 points (+236|-3)

Mass Shooters have used credit cards to buy guns. It's time to ban credit cards., submitted: 12/24/2018 6:19:56 PM, 226 points (+231|-5)

President Trump signs the Farm Bill making dog and cat meat illegal in the United States, submitted: 12/26/2018 10:22:21 PM, 222 points (+226|-4)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

DMCA from Black Rifle Coffee Company® submitted by PuttItOut to Voat

thewebofslime 0 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago


Object, always. Every single time. (In this case, also mention that the account already voluntarily removed material in question.) I hope that fellow users, here, also take to social media to let them know we don't appreciate frivolous DMCA abuse.

Have a standard template for objection.

Check out Facebook's policy:

Usernames are generally claimed on a first-come, first-served basis. This means that you may see a Facebook Page or profile that includes your trademark in its username. While there may be cases where this type of use can be reported for trademark infringement based on the context of its use, please note that not every use of your trademark in a username is necessarily a trademark infringement. The same word used in a different context may not violate your trademark.

Someone else may use a copyrighted mark on any social media platform as a username if there is no attempt to confuse consumers. If an account has had no updates, no profile image, and there is no intent to mislead, it typically means there’s no name-squatting or impersonation.

Affirmative Defense #1: They did not "consider" Fair Use applicability before sending the notice. Black Rifle Coffee Company failed to actually consider whether this qualified as fair use or not and, instead, had a knee jerk reaction at seeing a close facsimile, but not exact replication, of their company name. Instead, they had a "knee jerk" reaction.

Affirmative Defense #2: The account was not a misrepresentation, but merely a similar username and usernames are not copyrighted.

Affirmative Defense #3: The account did not post any infringing material.

Affirmative Defense#4: Since Black Rifle Coffee Company did not take into consideration legally required issues before sending the DMCA, the DMCA notice they initiated was, ITSELF, A MISREPRESENTATION, and therefore, Voat is entitled to tany legal fees that arise from their misrepresentation of the issue.

Affirmative Defense #5: Doctrine of Laches applies here, since they already had a reddit username of the same spelling, BUT DELETED IT because of the bad publicity the account gave. This happened OVER A YEAR AGO.

Affirmative Defense #6: Since they ALREADY ABANDONED THE SAME USERNAME on another social media platform over a year ago, they explicitly communicated intent to abandon on an almost identical platform.

Affirmative Defense #7: Black Rifle Coffee is selectively applying their poor interpretation of the law to target Voat, specifically, and has failed to achieve any results of a similar request ON ANY OTHER PLATFORM.

A copyright holder who pays lip service to the consideration of fair use by claiming it formed a good faith belief when there is evidence to the contrary is still subject to Section 512(f) liability.

Here is what youtube says:

"It is our position that in general use of a string of characters or group of words in a username that happens to be used as a trademark in some market by another party is not infringement. In almost all cases the use is not a commercial use in the meaning of trademark law, and does not cause confusion. Further, to the extent that most trademark claimants have not used their marks in a market or for services overlapping YouTube, the YouTube user has priority regarding that name within our market.

Want to advertise on VOAT? Just send in a DMCA request, your name will be all over the front page. submitted by Locked_Account to whatever

thewebofslime 0 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago

Actually, they had to pay a shill company to post hundreds of pictures of dogs to bury our commentary. Check their twitter.

I'm really liking Dissenter. submitted by pcdude to whatever

thewebofslime 2 points 42 points (+44|-2) ago

Dissenter can be used in a lot of interesting ways:

Correcting Wikipedia articles. Go go go.

Archiving the text within articles on the article, itself.

Posting people's private pictures publicly on their social media pages.

Calling out frauds on politicians' pages. Go go go.

The idiots in media have provided you with an opportunity to take over the Internet because they are telling the Left to stay away from it. Seriously, get to it.

You can make "alt right" mainstream or "conservative" or whatever you want to call yourself. Labels are lame and this is a good opportunity to prove that.

Reddit's /r/politics? Already getting heavily hit. There is nothing the mods can do. If 10,000 people comment on their subreddit, you will see something happen. They WILL freak out.

3 lowest rated comments:

Pizzagate is a Fact: The Totality of the Evidence (My Highest Effort Pizzagate Post Ever, Covers Uranium One, Gulftainer, Skolkovo, Mueller, etc.) submitted by thewebofslime to GreatAwakening

thewebofslime 7 points -7 points (+0|-7) ago

I edited the post three times. I'm trying.

Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.

What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.

So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.

Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?

Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.

Do you understand where I am really coming from?

I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.

You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.

Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.

Pizzagate is a Fact: The Totality of the Evidence (My Highest Effort Pizzagate Post Ever, Covers Uranium One, Gulftainer, Skolkovo, Mueller, etc.) submitted by thewebofslime to GreatAwakening

thewebofslime 7 points -7 points (+0|-7) ago

I made the submission in my subverse to publicly discuss your behavior, if you so choose to participate.

I made the protectvoat submission to gain an understanding of precedent.

And yeah... if you don't like people calling you out when you insult others, then don't insult them. I am totally happy to mix it up, but I've got a higher purpose, right now.

If you want top exchange insults later... go for it.

But you are super emotional and hitting me up constantly while I am trying to find links that you asked for.

Maybe wait for what I present, then respond. I'm trying to give you what you are asking for.

If you want to continue to be emotional about it, that is fine. I've been nothing but cooperative since I was ASKED to post in /v/Pizzagate, then was cooperative and polite when changes were recommended.

So, if you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem waiting for me to provide what is asked.

Remember when I said... If you are feeling pressure, it is merely because I am trying to pressure the entire world into knowing about Pizzagate.

Remember how I talk about systems psychodynamics and activating neurochemsitry to manipulate people? I've done exactly that to you in a response to what I perceive as a threat.

When I'm exchanging insults, I am doing it to according to systems psychodyanmics so that I can learn motivation. I am absolutely responsible for your emotional state right now because I made intentional moves to reveal your intentionality.

I do it all the time. you've seen me do it. You pressed me and you learned that I can press back a lot harder.

This time, though, I'm doing it with a few extra sets of eyes from people who laugh at Pizzagate.

I expected a response when I posted that thread because of the corruption it exposes and I was ready on all fronts to study the response. It's what I do and I've explained that over and over again and I've explained how I do it.

I have manipulated you into an excited emotional state to test you and reveal your true motives to determine whether or not I have to spend possibly days of my time and other people's time ruling you out as a suspect.

What type of evidence would I require to prove to Voat that users from the /v/Pizzagate subverse are carrying out injection attacks, bash attacks, etc? submitted by thewebofslime to ProtectVoat

thewebofslime 7 points -7 points (+0|-7) ago

I'm not disgruntled, I'm just trying to figure out what is going on.

You made up a fake rule in an attempt to censor my post. I haven't checked if you've responded to that or not, yet. Maybe next. So, it is weird that you are trying to discredit me even though I have been exceedingly cooperative and polite. I'm documenting everything. If you haven't done anything wrong, then... let's talk about it.

What is your actual issue? yadayadayada... I've already asked in other posts and I'd like to keep those conversation there.

Painting me as such...l even though I have been adhering to your requests and specifications seems a little dishonest, but I'm not here to talk about that.

I am looking for information on precedent, I suppose.

Since everyone uses similar logins, names passwords and such, it is easy to track down outside information on a lot of users.

So, I have been running a comparison to what I am seeing.

If you guys have been paying attention, you know I have the data to back up what I am saying.

This isn't a disgruntlement.

I was insulted... not that I care... then my site was attacked within minutes of the angered person who gave this response designed to discredit me.

Of course, I am met with insults.

But, I am just looking into what is going on.

If you don't believe me... ask me anything. I've been super transparent.

Literally ask me anything you need to be convinced.