This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
301 submissions to simulators
41 submissions to videos
36 submissions to gaming
36 submissions to news
36 submissions to politics
This user has so far shared a total of 579 links, started a total of 51 discussions and submitted a total of 685 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 14113 and downvoted 284 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 10269 and downvoted 2388 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Open Borders..., submitted: 5/23/2019 8:59:13 PM, 401 points (+404|-3)
United Kangdom, submitted: 6/13/2019 12:48:37 PM, 401 points (+405|-4)
Turkey Violated Greek Airspace 2,244 Times Last Year, Fires At Russia For Doing It Once, submitted: 11/25/2015 3:36:19 PM, 355 points (+367|-12)
Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of "Gender Theory", submitted: 6/18/2017 6:52:38 PM, 336 points (+337|-1)
Flaming F(l)ag, submitted: 6/4/2019 9:49:33 AM, 314 points (+315|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
The "Git Gud" Mentality is Why People Don't Take Games Seriously, submitted: 5/21/2016 11:14:24 AM, 0 points (+5|-5)
Bret Weinstein & Evergreen State College, submitted: 5/28/2017 11:00:18 AM, 0 points (+1|-1)
What Pisses Me Off About The London Bridge Terrorist Attack, submitted: 6/4/2017 12:06:20 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)
Nazis are Bad, submitted: 8/21/2017 1:27:45 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)
BREAKING: Count Dankula Convicted (#GrosslyOffensive), submitted: 3/20/2018 2:31:51 PM, 0 points (+1|-1)
3 highest rated comments:
Futt 6 points 83 points 89 points (+89|-6) ago
IMO low-effort crap is what the voting-system is meant to deal with; not a good reason for a ban in my opinion. They'll throttle themselves eventually when SCP goes into the negative. And if I may be allowed a "slippery slope" argument, this could be seen as.. well, a slippery slope. Who gets to decide what's quality content? How low must the quality be to warrant a ban? And how much is too much?
Futt 0 points 79 points 79 points (+79|-0) ago
Indeed, it is a privilege. Let's call it "white privilege".
Futt 1 points 72 points 73 points (+73|-1) ago
Why voat feels the need to air out this issue publicly is beyond me
Really? Not only are you taking legal steps to have a user erased, but also to have posts and comments purged, from a site devoted to free speech and open discourse - and you are baffled as to why that would be a topic for discussion here? You really thought @PuttItOut would just start quietly erasing people and pretend nothing happened? Well I guess that's how some other sites would have done it.. I for one am damn happy this is not how it's done at Voat.
3 lowest rated comments:
Futt 4 points -2 points 2 points (+2|-4) ago
No, it won't - just a bunch of far-left hippies drunk with being given some political leverage in the local elections, looking to implement their deranged utopian dreams, completely divorced from reality as usual. Either that, or a diversion tactic to get people up in arms over something else, rather than the fact that the same retards are filling Oslo to the brim with newly imported Jihadists.
Either way, I'd say it has about 0% chance of ever happening.
Futt 1 points -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
That's the Cult of Gaben to you, infidel!